ContextUS LogoTextsTopicsAuthorsDonate
Log inSign up
Dred Scott V Sandford
The Coming of the Civil War
Start Reading
Contents
Versions
Separate Opinion (Nelson)Opinion of the CourtDissent (Curtis)Separate Opinion (Grier)Concurrence (Campbell)Separate Opinion (Daniel)
Case Syllabus
Introduction
123456
Concurrence (Wayne)Dissent (McLean)Separate Opinion (Catron)

About This Text

Composed:  1833 CE
Dred Scott was an enslaved man who lived in Missouri. His owner brought Scott to live in the free state of Illinois and the free Territory of Wisconsin from 1833 to 1843 before returning to Missouri. Scott sued for his freedom in a Missouri court in 1846, citing that his residence in Illinois and Wisconsin territory made him a free man. The Supreme Court sided with Scott’s master, John Sanford, declaring that Congress could not ban slavery from a federal territory, which made the 1821 Missouri Compromise unconstitutional. Further, the opinion reaffirmed slaveholders’ property rights under the Fifth Amendment. Finally, the court denied that Black Americans, enslaved or free, were not citizens of the United States and thus could not sue in federal court.

Download Text

Select Version
Select Format
Download
About
What is ContextUS?HelpTeamThe Jack Miller Center
Tools
Source Sheets
Feedback
Request a TextReport a Bug
Join Us
Donate